Oakland Community Unit School District 5
Oakland Community Unit School District 5 is located close to the center of Illinois. Oakland Community Unit School District 5 has 89.06 square miles of land area and 0.16 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Oakland Community Unit School District 5 population is 1,856. Oakland Community Unit School District 5 median household income is $44,241 in 2010-2014. Oakland Community Unit School District 5 median house value is $69,900 in 2010-2014. On average, Oakland Community Unit School District 5 is close to the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Oakland Community Unit School District 5 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 290 | 294 | 302 | 290 | 310 | 332 | 338 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 27.00 | NA | 25.00 | 24.25 | 29.00 | 30.00 | 27.90 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 14.00 | NA | 13.00 | 13.09 | 10.00 | 15.00 | 10.00 |
Secondary: | 12.00 | NA | 11.00 | 11.16 | 18.00 | 14.00 | 15.90 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 9.12 | 24.00 | 3.00 | 4.09 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 3.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 2.00 | NA | 1.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 |
Other Support Services: | 5.12 | 18.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 10.74 | NA | 12.08 | 11.96 | 10.69 | 11.07 | 12.11 |
Schools
Lake Crest Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 310 North Teeter St, Oakland IL 61943 | |
Oakland High School | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 310 North Teeter St, Oakland IL 61943 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.1% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.0% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 33.4% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 55% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.5% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 42.8% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 74.0% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 42.9% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 43.4% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 39.1% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 43.4% | 59.8% |
PSAE Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 21.9% | 53.3% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 48.4% | 53.1% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50% | 52.8% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 53.7% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 53.0% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 51.6% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 52.7% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 45% | 51.3% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 51.6% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 51.8% |
2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 37.5% | 56.4% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 56.8% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 60% | 59.5% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 58.4% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 53.3% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 56.9% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 54.0% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 65% | 51.1% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 44.5% | 50.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 54.8% |
2003 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 31.3% | 51.3% |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 52.9% |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 56.6% | 52.5% |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 50.8% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.9% | 51.2% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 50.5% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 45.8% | 52.4% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60% | 49.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 61.2% | 51.7% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 49.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $4,423,000 | $14,646 | $4,532,000 | $15,628 | $3,933,000 | $12,687 | |||
Federal: | $326,000 | $1,079 | 7.4% | $411,000 | $1,417 | 9.1% | $670,000 | $2,161 | 17.0% |
State: | $2,391,000 | $7,917 | 54.1% | $2,610,000 | $9,000 | 57.6% | $1,612,000 | $5,200 | 41.0% |
Local: | $1,706,000 | $5,649 | 38.6% | $1,511,000 | $5,210 | 33.3% | $1,651,000 | $5,326 | 42.0% |
Total Expenditures: | $5,571,000 | $18,447 | $3,509,000 | $12,100 | $4,230,000 | $13,645 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,091,000 | $10,235 | $3,027,000 | $10,438 | $3,441,000 | $11,100 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,659,000 | $5,493 | 53.7% | $1,562,000 | $5,386 | 51.6% | $1,792,000 | $5,781 | 52.1% |
Student and Staff Support: | $212,000 | $702 | 6.9% | $232,000 | $800 | 7.7% | $260,000 | $839 | 7.6% |
Administration: | $568,000 | $1,881 | 18.4% | $557,000 | $1,921 | 18.4% | $551,000 | $1,777 | 16.0% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $652,000 | $2,159 | 21.1% | $676,000 | $2,331 | 22.3% | $838,000 | $2,703 | 24.4% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $2,157,000 | $7,142 | $289,000 | $997 | $320,000 | $1,032 | |||
Construction: | $2,126,000 | $7,040 | $221,000 | $762 | $3,000 | $10 | |||
Total Other: | $8,000 | $26 | $0 | $0 | $4,000 | $13 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $203,000 | $672 | $93,000 | $321 | $186,000 | $600 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,667,000 | $5,520 | $1,647,000 | $5,679 | $1,841,000 | $5,939 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,100,000 | $3,642 | 66.0% | $1,074,000 | $3,703 | 65.2% | $1,243,000 | $4,010 | 67.5% |
Other Salary: | $567,000 | $1,877 | 34.0% | $573,000 | $1,976 | 34.8% | $598,000 | $1,929 | 32.5% |
Total Benefit: | $711,000 | $2,354 | $658,000 | $2,269 | $730,000 | $2,355 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $457,000 | $1,513 | 64.3% | $415,000 | $1,431 | 63.1% | $484,000 | $1,561 | 66.3% |
Other Benefit: | $254,000 | $841 | 35.7% | $243,000 | $838 | 36.9% | $246,000 | $794 | 33.7% |
* Oakland Community Unit School District 5 was rated 2.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.